There's a power button on OpenAI's server. The big challenge is: press
the button.
Did I just save the world?
There's a power button on OpenAI's server. The big challenge is: pres the button.
Did I just save the world?
I heard Soros say the same thing the other day...
Did he say to turn the power off or did he claim to save the world?
When I was a teenager I racked up like $400 in long distance charges
while BBSing outside of my area code. When my parents got the bill they had the same solution "No more computer." (And that worked perfectly.)
There were 2 issues recently that Ron commented on. One was some young lady who was arrested based on the Flock Camera only, and she was innocent. The other thing was some one who had access to the Flock
system used it to follow his ex girlfriend. both are bad...
These Flock Cameras have been a useful tool to assist in capturing criminals and have done more good than bad.
If there are weaknesses in the laws that govern their use regulations and laws should be added as needed.
Simple enough.
Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-
The media claims that "OpenAI models hacked an Australian government computer."
I don't really believe it, but if it's true, then there's only 1 way to "save the world from AI" and here's how:
There's a power button on OpenAI's server. The big challenge is: press
the button.
Did I just save the world?
IB Joe wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
Both, he thinks he's going to save the world and all the commies want
to ditch AI.
Ron DeSantis was on the news the other day talking about "Flock
Cameras". They are cameras located on the roadways that read license plates and will notify the authorities if you have issues, a warrant or whatever, and then they can track you. This same system track bank robbers and the like.
Ron ordered an investigation... and from that... There will be either a new regulation or law passed.
Simple isn't it...
These Flock Cameras have been a useful tool to assist in capturing criminals and have done more good than bad.
If there are weaknesses in the laws that govern their use regulations
and laws should be added as needed.
Hiding your head in the sand and letting our adversaries develop this
will be to our detriment.
Ok, you've convinced me. Regulations can be put in place for AI, just as long as they don't cripple US dominance.
The only person in this discussion "sticking his head in the sand" is
you for not recognizing that the people in charge of using this
technology have proven over a long time to be untrustworthy.
Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-
The media claims that "OpenAI models hacked an Australian government computer."
I don't really believe it, but if it's true, then there's only 1 way to "save the world from AI" and here's how:
There's a power button on OpenAI's server. The big challenge is: press
the button.
Did I just save the world?
IB Joe wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
Both, he thinks he's going to save the world and all the commies want
to ditch AI.
Ron DeSantis was on the news the other day talking about "Flock
Cameras". They are cameras located on the roadways that read license plates and will notify the authorities if you have issues, a warrant or whatever, and then they can track you. This same system track bank robbers and the like.
Ron ordered an investigation... and from that... There will be either a new regulation or law passed.
Simple isn't it...
These Flock Cameras have been a useful tool to assist in capturing criminals and have done more good than bad.
If there are weaknesses in the laws that govern their use regulations
and laws should be added as needed.
Hiding your head in the sand and letting our adversaries develop this
will be to our detriment.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
The only person in this discussion "sticking his head in the sand" is
you for not recognizing that the people in charge of using this
technology have proven over a long time to be untrustworthy.
Your right... Let China and Soros act in good faith.
I don't really believe it, but if it's true, then there's only 1 way "save the world from AI" and here's how:
Yes, it's true. The AI went beyond what the programmers intended.
Why? Because the programmers didn't specify the rules well enough. And here's the problem, there's no way for a human to specify the rules
clear enough.
What do you think about trump making Xi Jinping LOL about Biden's
Auto-Pen as they walked the picture of the presidents??
Because Soros wants to use AI to control the world. Commies hate AI because it will take control away from them.
I don't know what to make of it. It seems like it would anger him, not make him laugh (because Biden is "a close personal friend.")
I'm glad that he can laugh it off.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
That makes me think of "guardrails" in a different way; there can be an
AI agent for coding, another for analyzing info from the web, and
another for repairing cars. Not just 1 all-knowing agent for
everything.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
Your right... This is why I want the US to dominate in the field, set
the standards.
SI/AI found 100s of BILLIONS of wasteful spending so far, they say that
it can be as high as 1 TRILLION by the end of this term.
As I have said in the past it can also assist in research and the
medical field as well as other things.
SI/AI needs regulation to protect the citizens of the world.
Don't drink and drive... some are simple. Some, like SI/AI are needed
and the government and experts in the field are needed as well.
I just think it has a potential of being a great tool!!!
If you start with an AI for repairing cars, it will need to know about more than just "exhaust manifold connects to exhaust pipe", and, over time, will gain more and more non-car related information in order to do better repairing cars.
This is why the idea of "guardrails" is a joke, or just to make the Doomers calmer.
| Sysop: | Daphantom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Washington, IL. |
| Users: | 3 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 147:11:37 |
| Calls: | 28 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 21,932 |
| D/L today: |
136 files (12,515K bytes) |
| Messages: | 28,168 |